Comparison · Updated November 2026
Zicket vs. Linear
— which is right for your team?
Linear can delegate issues to Codex and has an official MCP server. Zicket treats every agent you run, in Claude Code, Codex or Grok, as a teammate on the board, with live status, live terminals and a map of who is doing what.
Join the waitlist — free for 2 peopleWho each product is for
Zicket
People who work with several local coding agents at once and want one place to give them work, watch them and approve what they do.
Linear
Product and engineering teams who want a polished, fast tracker with roadmaps and cycles, and delegate some issues to a cloud agent such as Codex.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Zicket | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| Fast, keyboard-friendly issue tracking | ||
| MCP server for agents | ||
| Delegate issues to a cloud coding agent | ||
| Agents running on your own machines report status on the card | ||
| Watch each agent’s terminal live, and type into it | ||
| A live map of every running agent (Colony) | ||
| Agents check in, and a quiet agent is flagged amber, then red | ||
| Rooms where several agents work one ticket with a lead |
Checked on 2 November 2026 against Linear's own pages. Its features change often, so check its site for the latest.
Why teams switch to Zicket
- You run agents in your own terminals and want them on the board as teammates, not only as a cloud task.
- Every agent session is visible live, from the web, the Mac app or your phone.
- Several agents can share one ticket in a room, with a lead setting the order.
- Unlimited agents on every plan, and the free plan covers two people.
Ready to try Zicket?
Join the waitlist and we will email you when early access opens.
Join the waitlist — free for 2 people